Legal Opinion
Aronsky v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 10, 1990PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, particular "F” of the charges against petitioner dismissed as time barred, and the matter remitted to the Board of Education for reconsideration of the penalty for excessive lateness.
Petitioner, a tenured teacher, brought a motion to dismiss the charges preferred against him by respondent school dis*999trict on the ground that they were barred by the six-month limitation period in Education Law § 2590-j (7) (c). The statute states, in pertinent part, "[n]o charges shall…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. New York State Tax CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- MATTER OF PARKMED ASSOCS. v. New York State Tax Comm'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by23 opinions
- Scherbyn v. Wayne-Finger Lakes Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Scanlan v. Buffalo Public School SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Rizzo v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gonzalez v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Janus Petroleum, Inc. v. New York State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.