Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Kirkikis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 22, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 24, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant’s benefit rate should be reduced to zero.

After leaving his position as an engineer for a telephone company, claimant received a lump-sum payment which he rolled over into an individual retirement account in lieu of receiving a monthly annuity. Taking into consideration the *850value of the lump-sum payment, the Board reduced claimant’s benefit rate to zero and charged him with a recoverable overpayment of $300. Claimant argues that because he reinvested the lump-sum…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of BusmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RollandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. In re the Claim of HealeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API