Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Engblom v. Carey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 3, 1982No. 732, Docket 81-7769Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partIrving R. Kaufman, Circuit Judge

The majority holds that Judge Robert W. Sweet improperly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the claim of Marianne E. Engblom and Charles E. Palmer, state correction officers, that their Third Amendment rights were violated by the quartering of New York State National Guardsmen in their residences at the Mid-Orange Correctional Facility in Warwick, New York, during a statewide strike of correction officers. Supporting this theoretical and impracticable position, which acknowledges a farfetched Third Amendment “quartering” claim based on a constitutional provision…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API