Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Washington, D. C.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REILLY, Associate Judge:
The procedure adopted by clothing stores for limiting their liability for losses incurred by customers utilizing their storage services has been challenged by a judgment for damages rendered against Julius Garfinckel & Company (referred to herein as Garfinckel’s) and Washington Deliveries, Inc. This case is here on appeal by Garfinckel’s.
This action arose from a failure of Gar-finckel’s to redeliver to a customer two of three fur pieces she had placed in storage there some six months before. The customer, a Mrs. Earl M. Ryan, who had previously insured her fur coats…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hodges v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- Cowal v. HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Lucas v. Auto City Parking Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Hallman v. Federal Parking Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Fidelity Storage Co. v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. WallerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Richard Picker v. Searcher's Detective Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Houston v. SEC. Storage Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984