Legal Opinion

Julius Garfinckel & Co. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Washington, D. C.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1972No. 5928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REILLY, Associate Judge:

The procedure adopted by clothing stores for limiting their liability for losses incurred by customers utilizing their storage services has been challenged by a judgment for damages rendered against Julius Garfinckel & Company (referred to herein as Garfinckel’s) and Washington Deliveries, Inc. This case is here on appeal by Garfinckel’s.

This action arose from a failure of Gar-finckel’s to redeliver to a customer two of three fur pieces she had placed in storage there some six months before. The customer, a Mrs. Earl M. Ryan, who had previously insured her fur coats…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hodges v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Cowal v. HopkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Lucas v. Auto City Parking Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Hallman v. Federal Parking Services, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Fidelity Storage Co. v. KingsburyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. WallerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Richard Picker v. Searcher's Detective Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  3. Houston v. SEC. Storage Co. of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API