Legal Opinion

Kitten v. Stodden

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 10, 1966No. Gen. 65-121PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberspacher, J.

This suit was filed to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by Mack Kitten occasioned by the alleged negligence and wilful and wanton misconduct of the defendant, Albert J. Stodden, in driving his automobile. The jury rendered a verdict for the defendant upon which the trial court entered the judgment from which this appeal is taken.

The plaintiff appellant contends that the trial court committed four prejudicial errors as follows: (1) The court’s voir dire examination was inadvertently prejudicial; (2) The court erred in the admission of certain evidence; (3) The court erred in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shore v. TurmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  2. Hickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Schwartz v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  4. Bibby v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Skelton v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Sims v. BlockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Benuska v. DahlAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. Warp v. WhitmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  5. Chubb/Home Insurance Companies v. Outboard Marine Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API