Legal Opinion
Hurst v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 11, 2002No. 4D00-1310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
825 So.2d 517 (2002)
Daniel HURST, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D00-1310.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 11, 2002.
Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin W. Maserang, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Barbara A. Zappi, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
WARNER, J.
At appellant's trial for attempted robbery with a deadly weapon, the trial court refused to permit defense counsel to recross a witness. Whether to allow re-cross-examination is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Allan RossCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Charles Richard MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- Kobel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Kelly v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Tennyson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Sandoval v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Jimmy L. Castanos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.