Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dakins v. Black

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 1935No. Nos. 30,270, 30,271PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. M. Olsen, Justice.

Two actions, one by Howard Dakins as special administrator of the estate of Dorothy Dakins, deceased, to recover damages for the death of Dorothy Dakins, and one by Floyd Sebring to recover damages for personal injuries, claimed to have been caused by the gross negligence of the defendant, S. F. Black, in operating an auto-mobile. The actions were tried together and a verdict was returned in favor of the plaintiff in each case. Defendant thereafter moved' in each case for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, if that be denied, then for a neiv trial, and appeals from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Siesseger v. PuthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  3. Shaw, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Morris v. ErskineNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bobich v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. High v. Supreme Lodge of the WorldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. Jacobs v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Huffman v. Buckingham Transp. Co. of Colorado, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  5. Ackerman v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API