Legal Opinion

Weeden v. Corzo Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Corzo Construction Co., Inc., appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Garry, J.), dated April 29, 1996, as granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the summons and verified complaint to assert a cause of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

"While a court has broad discretion in deciding whether leave to amend should be granted, it is an improvident exercise of discretion to deny leave so as to assert an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Banfi Products Corp. v. GentileAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Roberts v. Alexander's, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Llama v. Mobil Service StationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. Kondek v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API