Legal Opinion
State v. Rivard
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 16, 1997No. 63906-0PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
The Prosecuting Attorney of Spokane County, for the State of Washington, seeks review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division III,1 which affirmed a decision of the Spokane County Superior Court suppressing results of a blood alcohol test administered to Respondent James D. Rivard shortly after an accident in which an automobile he was driving struck a person riding a skateboard.2 We granted review. We reverse the Court of Appeals.
*65 QUESTIONS PRESENTED
The questions presented are: (1) whether, whenever a driver has been involved in a serious automobile accident, the implied consent…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. RivardWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- City of College Place v. StaudenmaierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. AveryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. SalinasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.