Legal Opinion

State v. Courtney

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided April 6, 2017No. 20141172-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

¶1 Defendant Carl Mack Courtney appeals from his conviction for distribution of or arranging to distribute a controlled substance, a second degree felony. See Utah Code Ann. § 58-37-8 (1)(a)(ii) (LexisNexis 2012). Specifically, Defendant argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to timely move for a mistrial after a potential juror allegedly tainted the prospective juror pool. We reverse the trial court's denial of the mistrial motion, vacate Defendant's conviction, and remand the case for further proceedings.

¶2 Defendant was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KufrinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  2. State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API