Legal Opinion

Carr v. Hertz

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 5, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

As already stated, this bill is filed by Caroline A. Carr, executrix of John W. Carr, and Martha Carr, executrix of Joseph W. Carr, attacking several mortgages made by Charles Wenzel. The authority of Mr. Wenzel to execute those mortgages, if it existed at all, must rest upon an implied authority residing in him as a partner. It is clear he did not become a partner in the business by any conventional arrangement between Caroline A. Carr and himself. His right to rank as a partner resulted entirely as an inference of law, from the fact that he had carried on, with the property of his testator,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
  2. Monroe v. ConnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1838
  3. Knox v. Buffington & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rouse v. PollardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API