Legal Opinion

Marco Polo Hotel v. Popielarczyk

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 27, 1993No. 93-434PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

An affidavit of the injured employee of the subcontractor which averred “[tjhat to [his] knowledge” he was not a statutory employee of the contractor, was not sufficient competent evidence to counter the affidavits of the parties to the service contract. Thompson v. Citizens Nat’l Bank, 433 So.2d 32 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Campbell v. Salman, 384 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(e). Further, unambiguous language in the contract itself showed conclusively that the appellee was the statutory employee of the contractor. Tampa Port Auth. v. Tampa Barge Servs., Inc., 463 So.2d 557…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motchkavitz v. LC Boggs Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Campbell v. SalmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Thompson v. CITIZENS NAT. BK.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Tampa Port Authority v. Tampa Barge Services, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southland Const., Inc. v. Richeson Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API