Legal Opinion

Koehler v. Department of Agriculture & Markets

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcNaught, J.

For the reasons outlined in Pavlick v. Department of Agriculture & Markets (164 Misc. 42), decided concurrently herewith, the motion of the plaintiff for an injunction pendente lite is denied, without costs.

The motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint is granted without costs, upon the ground that the complaint now fails to state cause of action, as it seeks to enjoin the enforcement and to secure a declaratory judgment of unconstitutionality as to a statute that by legislation has ceased to exist.

Submit orders accordingly.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pavlick v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rueffer v. Department of Agriculture & MarketsNew York Court of Appeals · 1938