Legal Opinion

Twyman v. Roell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 19, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This case is before the Court on motion to dismiss as frivolous under Sections 4639 C. G. L., 2920 R. G. S., 4965 C. G. L., 3173 R. G. S., the briefs of all parties being and before the Court for consideration.

An examination of the briefs does not confirm the contention of the appellees that the appeal is wholly devoid of merit, as charged in the motion to dismiss, nor do we feel that the rule of Gill v. Smith, 119 Fla. 293, 161 Sou. Rep. 282 ( 2nd headnote), should be applied in the circumstances of the controversy here disclosed.

Therefore the motion to dismiss the appeal as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gill v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ashland Oil, Inc. v. PickardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Ex parte SamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API