Legal Opinion

Luscomb v. Bowker

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 25, 1956PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, C.J.

This bill in equity, originally brought against ten defendants, alleges that seven of the defendants are members of the special commission first established by c. 89 of the Resolves of 1953, and subsequently revived and continued “for the purpose of conducting an investigation and study of the extent, character and objects of communism and subversive activities and related matters within the commonwealth; the diffusion within the commonwealth of subversive and un-American propaganda that is instigated from foreign countries, or of a domestic origin, and attacks the principle of the form of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Coffin v. CoffinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1808
  4. Emery's caseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Marshall v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aronson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Maltzman v. HertzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  3. Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Commissioner of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Solomon v. Congregation Tiffereth IsraelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Seskevich v. City Clerk of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API