Haney v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
This appeal is from judgment for plaintiff in an action to recover for injury sustained by plaintiff while engaged in repairing a chute on a tipple used for coaling locomotives in defendant’s Connellsville Yard. The coal tipple and the tracks alongside were instrumentalities used in interstate and in intrastate commerce. For present purposes we assume defendant’s negligence as established by the verdict. Plaintiff sues under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 TJSCA, sections 51-59. The defense was that plaintiff was not employed in interstate commerce, that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Erie Railroad v. SzarySupreme Court of the United States · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Painter v. B. O. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Painter v. Baltimore & Ohio RrailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940