Anzaldua v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REYNOLDS, Commissioner.
The conviction for assault with intent to murder with malice for which punishment was assessed at twelve years’ confinement following a jury trial is affirmed.
A consideration of the points of error requires a statement of the facts. Appellant Jesus Anzaldua and the prosecutrix, Yolanda Anzaldua, were husband and wife. They had been married approximately five years and lived in Brownsville. While attending a dance, they began a discussion concerning appellant’s contention that the prosecutrix had spoiled their young son. Since they were attracting the attention of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schulz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Redd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Blanton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Wheeler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Gruber v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
- Pratt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Thompson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
- City of Houston v. Williams, Steve, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.