Legal Opinion
Weessies v. Van Dykes Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1909No. (Docket No. 178.)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Error to Kalamazoo; Knappen, J. Harm Weessies presented a claim against the estate of Harm Van Dyke, deceased, for services rendered. The claim was allowed in part by the commissioners, and Walter Hoek, executor, appealed to the circuit court.. A judgment for contestant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by claimant on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
Appellant presented the following claim against the estate of Harm Van Dyke, deceased:
*181“For board, washing, care, etc., of Harm Van Dyke, six years preceding his decease, at §4.. §1,248 00
“For extra services and care of said Harm Van Dyke during the last year of his life, after he was stricken with paralysis, and during his last sickness............--------------------- 104 00
“For rent of lot, taxes, and insurance paid and incurred for Harm Van Dyke during the last six years of his life.......................... 150 00
§1,502 00”
The commissioners on claims allowed the sum of $1,000. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Decker v. Kanous' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Ashley v. Smith's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- More v. LutherMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Hialey v. Hialey's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by12 opinions
- McInerney v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Carnes v. SheldonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Johnson v. DouglasMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Roznowski v. BozykMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re Moon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.