First Nat. Bank of Montgomery v. Powell
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The bill in this suit was filed by the holder of a judgment lien to enforce that lien on certain shares of bank stock of defendant in the judgment. The claim of lien was by virtue of section 7875, Code. Defendant in the judgment had died. No question is raised as to the general equity of such a bill. Section 8935, Code; Erlenbach v. Cox, 200 Ala. 298, S9 So. 465; Griffith v. First National Bank, 221 Ala. 311, 12S So. 595; Johnston v. Bates, 209 Ala. 16, 95 So. 375; Ashley v. Thrasher, 226 Ala. 313, 146 So. 807.
It is to enforce that lien that equity has jurisdiction, both…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miller v. SherrySupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Davidson v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
- Evans v. WelchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- McAfee v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Enslen v. WheelerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rowe v. Bonneau-Jeter Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- I. Trager Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Allen v. First Alabama Bank (In re Sintz)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 1993
- Nelson v. Lowery Building & Supply Co. (In re Satterfield)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989