Legal Opinion

People v. Higdon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03) *958is supported by legally sufficient evidence (see, People v Pons, 68 NY2d 264; People v Carrion, 136 AD2d 649, Iv denied 71 NY2d 967; People v [Mark] Taylor, 121 AD2d 581, Iv denied 68 NY2d 817). The trier of fact properly could have inferred the requisite intent from the circumstances surrounding the shooting (see, People v Taylor, supra, at 582; People v Evans, 106 AD2d 527). Further, where one who possesses a loaded firearm is not licensed to do so,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. PonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Marenghi v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. CarrionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BookerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. CrawfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. TopsyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. People v. McCulloughNew York Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API