Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Noonan v. Noonan

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1989PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William Rigler, J.

The matter having come on to be heard before this court and both parties having submitted papers, the court determines the order to show cause and cross motion as follows:

In this application, petitioner, for the benefit of her three infant children, seeks to obtain visitation for her children with their two half siblings. The issue of visitation between half siblings is a novel legal question that raises many complex and personal issues. This is especially true when, as in the case at bar, the court has already made a determination that the natural father…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lihs Ex Rel. Lihs v. LihsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. Harley v. DruzbaNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Leora F. v. Sofia D.New York City Family Court · 1995
  4. Alexandra D. v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Alexandra D. v. SantosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API