Legal Opinion

People v. Ragusa

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 3, 2009No. 06CA1110PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RICHMAN.

Defendant, Patricia Jagielski Ragusa, directly appeals the judgments of conviction and sentences entered on jury verdiets finding her guilty of theft, attempted theft, computer crime, and attempted computer crime. We reverse the judgments, vacate the sen tences, and remand the case for further proceedings.

I. Facts and Procedural History

The prosecution charged defendant with fifty-one counts of theft and attempted theft in violation of section 18-4-401(1), (2)(c), and (2)(d), C.R.S.2008, and fifty-one counts of computer crime and attempted computer crime in violation of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  5. People v. CastroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. FuentesColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. DelgadilloColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. People v. PayneColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. StroudColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. People v. WingfieldColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API