State v. Maloney
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Chief Justice.
This case comes to us from the Superior Court .of Maricopa County after we remanded it to that court for the limited purp.osfe o'f a hearing on the voluntariness óif certain inculpatory statements , made by the defendant. See State v. Maloney, 101 Ariz. 111, 416 P.2d 544 (1966). On remand, after holding the required hearing, the trial court found that these statements were uttered voluntarily. We delayed our determination of .this case pending the recent- decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Application of Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Walter L. Harling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- State v. ShawArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Application of GaultArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. MaloneyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. PrudeIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. JimenezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. LoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- State v. CanoArizona Supreme Court · 1968
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.