Legal Opinion

Crotzer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1983No. 82-1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s convictions but remand for correction of the sentences on counts 1 and 10.

First, the trial court’s retention of jurisdiction over count 1, the attempted robbery conviction, must be stricken, since section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1981), which.permits retention of jurisdiction over sentences for certain enumerated offenses, does not include attempted robbery on the list of applicable offenses. See Williams v. State, 374 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). Second, it is apparent from the colloquy at the sentencing hearing that the trial court intended that the sentences for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Famiglietti v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API