Legal Opinion

Pharr Cotton Co. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 10, 1923No. 13945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The controlling question in this case is whether or not the words “Via Union Compress at Augusta,” written on the face of the bills of lading issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, amounted to a binding and enforceable contract requiring the defendant to compress, at Augusta, Ga., cotton delivered to the defendant at Washington, Ga., for shipment? All the shipments involved in this suit were shipments from a point in the State of Georgia to points outside the State, and were, therefore, subject to the act to regulate commerce between the States. This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & O. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1890
  2. Gamble-Robinson Commission Co. v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  3. Florida Central Railroad v. Cherokee Sawmill Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Draper v. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. Pharr Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API