Legal Opinion
Mayotte v. Bauer
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 21, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Anthony F. Shaheen, J.
I have again reviewed the papers in defendant Dr. Bauer’s above-captioned motion for summary judgment, as well as my notes from the oral argument and the applicable law.
The defendant Dr. Bauer asserts that plaintiff’s action is time barred because his last contact with the plaintiff was her annual exam on June 14, 1979, more than two and one-half years before he was served with the summons and complaint on February 19, 1982. The plaintiff opposes summary judgment claiming that her action was commenced within one year of discovery that her intrauterine…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flanagan v. Mount Eden General HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Ooft v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Darragh v. County of NassauNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Bidetti v. SalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Darragh v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Manhattan Medical Group, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Vinciguerra v. JamesonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Beatman v. GatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rodriguez v. Manhattan Medical Group, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990