Ex parte Law
District Court, S.D. Georgia
[In the matter of William Law, involving the subject of the oath to be taken by attorneys and counselors of the national courts, under the act of congress of January 24,1805 (13 Stat. 424).]
1Opinion of the Court
ERSKINE, District Judge.
William Law, Esq., produced in court satisfactory proof that, in the year 1817, he was, by the circuit and district courts of the United States for the district of Georgia, duly admitted to practice as an attorney, proctor, solicitor, advocate, and counselor at the bar of said courts, respectively; that he has been since the year of Finigan v. The Parliament, a cause now depending on the admiralty side of this court; that he has taken the oath of amnesty; that upon the promulgation by the president of the United States of the proclamation of May 29, 1865 [13 Stat.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cochran v. Van SurlayNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- City of Bridgeport v. Housatonuc RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
- Cohen v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Ray v. BirdseyeCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1846
- In re the Oaths to be taken by Attorneys & CounsellorsNew York Supreme Court · 1823
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sunshine, II v. BeavinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Nelson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Wayne v. HartridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.