Legal Opinion
Pelfresne v. Village of Rosemont
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 8, 1997No. 96 C 4658PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GETTLEMAN, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59, plaintiffs, D. Pelfresne and S. Eisenberg, have filed-he instant “Motion for Rehearing” of this court’s memorandum opinion and order dated February 3,1997, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on grounds of abstention under Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971), and the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283. On February 4, 1997, along with the “motion for rehearing,” plaintiffs filed March 6,1997, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. For the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Milton B. Russell v. Delco Remy Division of General Motors Corporation, Saegertown Manufacturing Company and Jordan ChalmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Bankers Trust Company, Cross-Appellee v. Old Republic Insurance Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pelfresne v. StephensDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
- Johnson v. OystacherDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018