Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Jacobs v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 7, 1997No. 95-CA-002873-MR, 95-CA-002875-MRPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSchroder, Judge

The facts in this case are relatively simple. A sitting circuit judge recused himself and the chief regional circuit judge appointed a retired judge as a special judge to hear defendant’s case. Section 110(5)(b) of the Kentucky Constitution and KRS 26A.020(1) allows the chief justice to appoint a retired judge as a special judge, but neither the Constitution nor the Supreme Court’s rules, adopted pursuant to section 112(4) of the Kentucky Constitution, allows a regional circuit judge to make such an appointment.

The majority holds that the appointment is voidable only if there was a timely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kuprion v. FitzgeraldKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Martin v. StumboCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Pinkleton v. LuekeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Ketcham v. Manning, JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Regency Pheasant Run Ltd. v. KaremKentucky Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API