State v. Richmond

Brazil, C.J.:

Robert L. Richmond appeals the sentences imposed following a guilty plea to three counts of possession of cocaine. He argues that the court erred in ordering him to serve two terms consecutively. He also argues that the State violated the plea agreement. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

When sentencing Richmond, the court stated that the sentences imposed in 91 CR 1355 would run consecutive to the sentence in 91 CR 1372 as required by statute.

Richmond argues that die trial court erred in ordering the sentences in 91 CR 1355 and 91 CR 1372 to run consecutively.…