Legal Opinion

Stokes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2006No. 130667PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

714 N.W.2d 347 (2006)

475 Mich. 875

Fredie STOKES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 130667 & (11)(14)(15). COA No. 268544.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 1, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file briefs amicus curiae are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. On the Court's own motion, pursuant to MCR…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boggetta v. Burroughs Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  2. VANGEISON v. Attorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stokes v. CHRYSLER LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Stokes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. VANGEISON v. Attorney Grievance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Stokes v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API