Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cheatham v. Pohle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2003No. 40S01-0209-CV-471Published

1DissentDickson, J.

The punitive damages scheme enacted in 1995 sought to modify Indiana's common law regarding punitive damages by capping the maximum amount of a punitive damage award at three times the amount of compensatory damages or $50,000, whichever is greater, and by requiring seventy-five percent of the final award to be allocated for use by the Violent Crime Victims' Compensation Fund. Ind.Code §§ 34-51-3-5, -6. To facilitate these objectives, this scheme requires that the statutory cap and allocation be concealed from every jury considering a claim for punitive damages. I.C. § 34-51-3-8. There is no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Wilson v. BrookshireIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Cheatham v. PohleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Haynes v. ContatIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API