Legal Opinion

United States v. Steve Tristan Vasquez, Alfredo Paul Guajardo, and Daniel Gomez, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 23, 1992No. 90-2088PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Steve Tristan Vasquez (“Vasquez”), Alfredo Paul Guajardo (“Gua-jardo”) and Daniel Gomez, Jr. (“Gomez”)— found guilty (1) of conspiring to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B) and 846, and (2) of aiding and abetting the possession of more than 100 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 — appeal their convictions. 1 Finding no error, we affirm.

I

On July 18, 1989, Guajardo contacted Roland Graz (“Graz”), a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Walter Richard, Lesburn Lloyd Da Costa, and Headley WeirCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  3. United States v. Charles J. Spears, Also Known as "Blackie," and Donald Meeks, United States of America v. Kim CurranCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Augustin Carrillo-Morales, Carlos Prado-Yepez, Pedro Gallegos, Jr., and Rudy Louis AustinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API