Legal Opinion

Mature v. Angelo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 25, 1953No. Appeal, No. 140PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Horace Stern,

The law governing tort liability arising from the negligence of a “borrowed” employe is so well established in this Commonwealth that, when applied to the present facts, there is no question but that the ease was correctly decided by the court below.

The principles — so many times proclaimed and reiterated — may be stated categorically as follows:

1. One who is in the general employ of another may, with respect to certain work, be transferred to the service of a third person in such a way that he becomes, for the time being and in the particular service…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Siidekum v. Animal Rescue League of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Thatcher v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mature v. AngeloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Ashman v. Sharon Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Ashman v. Sharon Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API