Legal Opinion
Tomasello v. Rubin
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 18, 1996No. Civ. A. 93-1326 RMUPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
URBINA, District Judge.
GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S RETALIATION CLAIMS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO LIMIT THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO THE JURY
In its motion in limine, Defendant moved the court to dismiss Plaintiffs retaliation claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. Sec. 621 et seq. (“ADEA”); and requested that the court limit the evidence which would be presented to the jury. For…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John L. Taylor v. Western And Southern Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Forman, Paul v. Small, Lawrence M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Louis TOMASELLO, Jr., Appellant, v. Robert E. RUBIN, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- Kilpatrick v. RileyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Tomasello, Louis v. Rubin, RobertCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999