Legal Opinion

Austin v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 24, 1992No. Appeal No. 5PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion by Seimax Gas Corporation et al., for clarification and other relief denied; motion by City of Buffalo et al., for clarification and for other relief granted and decision dated January 31, 1992 and remittitur order entered January 31, 1992 [179 AD2d 1079] are amended to provide that the order appealed from is unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The order is modified by granting defendants’ motions to the extent of dismissing the causes of action brought by or on behalf of the deceased and injured firelight*1144er…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Koch v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Austin v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Black Industries, Inc. v. Emco Helicopters, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. City of Utica v. HoltNew York Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. County of Erie v. Colgan Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. Shepard v. Morning Pride Manufacturing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API