Legal Opinion

Bryce v. Southern Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On Rehearing. For former opinion, see 122 Fed. 709.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case now comes up on a motion for rehearing the order refusing to remand the cause. The importance of the question involved, and the weight of the arguments of counsel upon the motion, demand and have received most careful consideration. The whole question has been studiously reviewed.

The cause of action is injury to a passenger upon the Southern Railway arising from the derailment of one of its trains. The defendants to the action are the corporation itself and the conductor and engineer of the train. The complaint prays judgment against all the defendants. It…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Steele v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  3. Richardson v. Florida Central & Peninsula R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mallory S. S. Co. v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. WittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Pollard v. CoulterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. Bryce v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API