People v. Alexander
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Mikoll, J. P.,
(dissenting). I respectfully dissent.
The prosecutor improperly urged the jury to infer that the People’s sole eyewitness could not have erred in his identification of defendant since both were African-Americans. Arguments which encourage jurors to weigh testimony on the basis of racial similarity are inherently improper (see, People v Williams, 40 AD2d 812; People v Burris, 19 AD2d 557) and have warranted reversal even in the absence of an objection thereto (see, People v Thomas, 129 AD2d 596). Such remarks offend “the democratic and logical principle that race, creed or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. FlowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- People v. OrtizAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. HearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- People v. BurrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.