Legal Opinion

Pazden v. Maurer

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 27, 2005No. 03-4236PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MCKEE, Circuit Judge.

Michael Pazden appeals from the District Court’s order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Pazden was convicted in state court on a 119 count indictment involving “white-collar fraud” stemming from the sale of condominiums in Clifton, New Jersey. We are asked to determine if the trial court violated Pazden’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel when the court denied defense counsel’s request for a continuance and Pazden proceeded to trial pro se. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the trial court did violate Pazden’s Sixth…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Omar Pouncy v. Carmen PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. People v. BergerudSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
  3. Gibbs v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Lathem v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. United States v. SingletonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API