United States v. Fishing Vessel Mary Ann, Her Engines, MacHinery Masts, Anchors, Etc., in Rem
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge:
Ahto Walter, one of the appellants, had built for him a vessel for fishing and freezing. To complete the vessel Walter borrowed $397,506 from the United States through the United States Bureau of Commercial Fisheries pursuant to the authorization of the Fish and Wildlife Act, 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 742a-742k. To evidence the indebtedness Walter and his wife, Lucy A. Walter, gave a promissory note payable to the order of the United States of America and secured by a preferred ship mortgage on the vessel under construction, the MARY ANN. Ewen Duff Walter, the son of Ahto Walter,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edgar Stavang v. American Potash and Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Jack G. Levine and Eileen M. Levine v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Fishing Vessel Mary AnnDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co. v. M/V MontmartreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Walter v. Marine Office of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Cactus Pipe & Supply Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee v. M/v Montmartre, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., Orient Leasing Co., Ltd., Cross v. Corinth Pipeworks, S.A., Cross Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- State v. LeonardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- Ahto Walter v. Marine Office Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976