Legal Opinion
LOVE v. ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARY
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 23, 2019No. 2:19-cv-00445Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ) CHRISTOPHER LOVE, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) No. 2:19-cv-00445-GZS ) ROYAL FLEET AUXILIARY, ) ) Defendant ) ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND RECOMMENDED DISMISSAL OF THE CASE The plaintiff in this action, Christopher Love, has filed a complaint against the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (“RFA”). See Testimonial of the Sponsored Reservist Legislation martyr (“2019 Complaint”) (ECF No. 1) at [1]. I conclude that Mr. Love may proceed in forma pauperis but recommend that the court dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apparel Art International, Inc. v. Amertex Enterprises Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Steve Isaac v. William SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.