Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. Schmitz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2001No. 20000133PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Orell Schmitz appeals from a judgment denying his motion to modify spousal support, and Ann Schmitz appeals from a judgment awarding her $2,000 in attorney fees. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Orell Schmitz and Ann Schmitz were married April 13, 1974, and divorced June 15, 1993. The original divorce decree established Orell’s spousal support at $800 a month for five years, with the trial court retaining jurisdiction over spousal support.

[¶ 3] On August 13, 1997, Ann moved the trial court to amend the original judgment. The trial court entered an amended judgment dated December 17,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Weigel v. WeigelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Cermak v. CermakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Schiff v. SchiffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Greenwood v. GreenwoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Wheeler v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sommer v. SommerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Harger v. HargerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Meyer v. MeyerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Corbett v. CorbettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API