Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Antunez

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided September 13, 2024No. 1:24-cv-22464Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 24-cv-22464-ALTMAN/Sanchez JANET L. SCHMIDT, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JUAN C. ANTÚNEZ, et al., Defendants. _____________________________/ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION Our Plaintiffs, Janet L. Schmidt and John R. Fernstrom,1 have sued our Defendants (two lawyers, Juan C. Antúnez and Kimberly Martinez-Lejarza) for “invasion of privacy—public disclosure of private facts[.]” Complaint [ECF No. 1] at 1. The Defendants ask us to stay these proceedings and compel arbitration based on a July 7, 2021 “engagement agreement”…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API