People v. Diggins
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence granted and the case remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment.
It is well established that a defendant may not, by his absence alone, “waive his right to effective assistance of counsel” (People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394, 398 [1978]). Although a defendant’s willful absence from trial surely hampers an attorney’s ability to represent the client adequately and must be taken into consideration,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. AikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. DigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. VonRapackiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024