Legal Opinion

People v. Diggins

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence granted and the case remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the indictment.

It is well established that a defendant may not, by his absence alone, “waive his right to effective assistance of counsel” (People v Aiken, 45 NY2d 394, 398 [1978]). Although a defendant’s willful absence from trial surely hampers an attorney’s ability to represent the client adequately and must be taken into consideration,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. AikenNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. People v. DigginsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. VonRapackiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. People v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  3. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API