Legal Opinion

Schiff v. Pollard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 7, 2015No. 2015-CA-0340PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.

| Nhe plaintiffs/appellants, Robert Andrew Schiff and N.O.W. Properties, LLC (“N.O.W.”) (collectively hereafter, “Schiff’), appeal a judgment in favor of the defendant/appellee, Lidia Pollard (“Ms.Pollard”), that dismissed their petition to nullify an earlier judgment based on fraud or ill practices, sustaining an exception of *721peremption. See La. C.C.P. art. 2004.1 For the reasons that follow, we are required to reverse the judgment that dismissed the nullity action with prejudice and remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

This is the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wright v. Louisiana Power & LightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  2. Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. Jolin, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Gladstone v. American Auto. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  4. Barber v. TestaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Davis v. Sewerage and Water Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schiff v. PollardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. Blake v. BlakeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Anthony T. Straughter, Deron Alexander and Russell Bickham v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina, the Trinity System, Inc., and Aaron Matthew WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  4. Lzm Properties, LLC v. Private Connection Properties, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Lzm Properties, LLC v. Private Connection Property, Inc. and John DoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API