Ackles v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Judge.
Robert Churchill Ackles was charged with possession of marijuana. When his motion to suppress the tangible evidence was denied, he entered a plea of nolo con-tendere and was placed on eighteen month’s probation with adjudication and sentence withheld.
The only question on appeal is whether the court should have granted appellant’s motion to quash the tangible evidence on the grounds that the same was seized as a result of an illegal search. Ap-pellee contends that the question is not properly preserved for appellate review because the nolo plea was not made expressly conditional…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Preston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Jetmore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Jackson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Perry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- State v. RamerizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.