Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Kansas Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1992No. 66,054PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

This is an appeal of a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant in this case asserts that he has a liberty interest in receiving a recommendation for a sentence modification from the Secretary of Corrections. The appellant asserts that this protected liberty interest was created by the Kansas Department of Corrections Internal Management Policy and Procedure No. 011-114.

The appellant is incarcerated in the custody of the Kansas Secretary of Corrections. He was convicted of the sale of cocaine, a class C felony, and the attempted possession of cocaine, a class D felony. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farris v. McKuneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Amos v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Graham v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. Dye v. Kansas State Supreme CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
  5. Amos v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API