Goddard v. Kansas Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Pierron, J.:
This is an appeal of a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The appellant in this case asserts that he has a liberty interest in receiving a recommendation for a sentence modification from the Secretary of Corrections. The appellant asserts that this protected liberty interest was created by the Kansas Department of Corrections Internal Management Policy and Procedure No. 011-114.
The appellant is incarcerated in the custody of the Kansas Secretary of Corrections. He was convicted of the sale of cocaine, a class C felony, and the attempted possession of cocaine, a class D felony. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Pardons v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Farris v. McKuneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Amos v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Graham v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
- Dye v. Kansas State Supreme CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Amos v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.