Spillers v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
1. The defendant’s first enumeration of error, the denial of a continuance, is based on the fact that only a day and a half intervened between the appointment of counsel and the call of the case for trial, of which a full working day necessarily required appointed counsel’s presence in the courtroom on other cases, and the half day, spent with the defendant the afternoon before the trial, was insufficient to allow preparation of the defense, including procuring medical witnesses. Under these circumstances, the denial of a continuance was error. "Undue haste in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Foote v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re BrookinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Bacon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Kauffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
- David Franklin Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.