Ex parte Cox
Supreme Court of Florida
This case was decided by the court En Banc. The writ of error in this cause was issued by the clerk of the Supreme Court to a judgment ¡rendered by a Justice of the Supreme Court in a habeas corpus proceeding before him.
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.
A writ of error from this court was sued out by petitioner to review a judgment in a habeas corpus proceeding rendered by a Justice of this court, before whom the writ of habeas corpus was returnable. The question arises whether this court has appellate jurisdiction in such a case.
*538The right of appeal is not as of course, and if it exists, it is because provision is made therefor, in our organic or statute law. In re. Curley, 34 Iowa, 184.
In section 5 of Article V of our constitution, jurisdiction is conferred upon this court as follows: “The Supreme Oourt .shall have appellate jurisdiction in…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Auditor of State v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Lake v. LakeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
- Thebaut v. CanovaSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
- Chapman v. ReddickSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
- State ex rel. West v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Hardee v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- State ex rel. Cave v. TincherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- State ex rel. Lytle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.