Legal Opinion

Sisson v. Schultz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1930No. Docket No. 54, Calendar No. 34,973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff, a piano tuner, recovered judgment upon verdict of a jury against defendant for five dollars for tuning a piano. Defendant reviews on case-made.

No agreement to pay is claimed against defendant. The piano was tuned while he was away from home. Plaintiff contends he did the work at defendant’s home at the instance and request of defendant’s wife and daughter. This was disputed question of fact left to the jury. Recovery was on the theory that tuning the piano was a necessary for which defendant is liable, and this is the sole meritorious question in the case.

Defendant owned a farm in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Cory v. CookSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902
  3. International Text Book Co. v. DoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jonitz v. JonitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. Publishers Agency, Inc. v. BrooksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Miller v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Miller v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API